Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 4, 2025

Gupta v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:25-cv-00761
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureImmigrationPro Se
In one sentence

In Gupta v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Judge Oetken ordered Ankar Gupta to sign his complaint within 30 days.

Who this affects

Ankar Gupta, the unrepresented plaintiff. The case will be processed if he submits the required signature; otherwise, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

What happened

Gupta v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service concerns an unsigned complaint filed by Ankar Gupta, who is representing himself. The court explained that court papers filed by an unrepresented person must be signed.

The court directed Gupta to submit the attached signature page within 30 days. He may use a handwritten signature for mail or in-person filing, or an electronic signature or typed name with "/s/" when submitting by email.

Judge J. Paul Oetken ordered that the case proceed through the Clerk’s Office if Gupta complies. If he does not comply on time, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gupta v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services · No. 1:25-cv-00761
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Feb. 4, 2025

Background

Ankar Gupta brought the action without a lawyer. The complaint he submitted was unsigned. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) requires every pleading, motion, and other court paper filed by an unrepresented party to be signed by that party.

Order

The court directed Gupta to sign and submit the attached signature page within 30 days of the order. A document submitted by mail or in person must contain a handwritten signature that complies with Rule 11(a). If Gupta submits the document by email to ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov, he may use an electronic signature or a typed name with "/s/ Ankar Gupta" on the signature line. The document must identify docket number 25-CV-761 (JPO).

If Gupta complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed without prejudice, meaning the order does not bar a later filing on that basis.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge J. Paul Oetken did not address the underlying claims in this order; he directed Gupta to correct the missing signature before the case proceeds.

Classification basis

This is a procedural order addressing a filing requirement and the consequences of failing to meet it. It does not decide the merits of Gupta’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.