Reyes v. Pvolve LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:25-cv-00187
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Reyes v. Pvolve LLC, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by March 10, 2025.
Nathalie Reyes, Pvolve LLC, and the people described in the caption as others similarly situated.
What happened
Nathalie Reyes brought this action against Pvolve LLC on behalf of herself and others described as similarly situated. The court received Reyes’s letter stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by March 10, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Reyes v. Pvolve LLC · No. 1:25-cv-00187
- Vyskocil
- Feb. 6, 2025
Background The case was brought by Nathalie Reyes, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, against Pvolve LLC. The opinion states that the court received a letter from Reyes informing it that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Court’s Action The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. It also ordered that the action could be restored to the court’s calendar without prejudice if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by March 10, 2025.
Effect of the Deadline Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no application to restore the action was made by March 10, 2025, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement or describe its terms.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.