Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 7, 2025

Nolasco-Martinez v. Puzio

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-10073
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Nolasco-Martinez v. Puzio, Judge Swain transferred a prisoner’s sentence-credit challenge to Connecticut because he was confined there.

Who this affects

Juan Nolasco-Martinez, whose sentence-credit petition was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the District of Connecticut; the Connecticut court will decide whether he may proceed without paying the filing fee.

What happened

In Nolasco-Martinez v. Puzio, Juan Nolasco-Martinez, who was incarcerated at FCI Danbury in Connecticut, filed a self-represented petition challenging the calculation of his time credits under the First Step Act.

The Southern District of New York ruled that a challenge to physical confinement generally belongs in the federal district where the prisoner is confined, so it transferred the case to the District of Connecticut.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the transfer and closed the case in New York. The Connecticut court must decide whether Nolasco-Martinez may proceed without paying the filing fee, and the court denied fee-free status for any appeal from the transfer order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nolasco-Martinez v. Puzio · No. 1:24-cv-10073
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 7, 2025

Background

Juan Nolasco-Martinez, who was incarcerated at FCI Danbury in Connecticut, filed a self-represented petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He challenged how the Bureau of Prisons calculated his sentence credits under the First Step Act. The opinion states that he had not paid the $5 filing fee or submitted an application to proceed without paying it.

Reason for Transfer

A court deciding a petition under § 2241 must have authority over the person or institution holding the petitioner. For challenges to physical confinement, that authority generally lies in the federal district where the petitioner is confined. Because FCI Danbury is in Connecticut, the Southern District of New York transferred the petition to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which allows a case to be transferred when another federal district is the proper venue.

The court did not decide whether Nolasco-Martinez’s time credits were calculated correctly or whether he should receive any other relief.

Ruling and Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the District of Connecticut and stated that the New York case was closed. The transferee court must decide whether Nolasco-Martinez may proceed without paying the filing fee. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying fees. The order does not state that the petition was dismissed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.