Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 7, 2025

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Mitmo, Inc.

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:25-cv-01079
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Mitmo, Inc., Judge Garnett set deadlines for an arbitration-confirmation petition.

Who this affects

The petitioners and Mitmo, Inc., the respondent in the petition to confirm an arbitration award, are affected by the filing, response, reply, and service deadlines.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Mitmo, Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was filed on February 6, 2025.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by February 28, 2025. Mitmo, Inc.’s opposition, if any, is due March 28, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, is due April 18. The petitioners must also serve the petition, supporting papers, and the order under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by February 28 and file proof of service by March 3.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett issued a scheduling order and did not decide in this order whether the arbitration award should be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:25-cv-01079
Judge
Garnett
Date
Feb. 7, 2025

Background

On February 6, 2025, the petitioners filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. The order states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court considers the parties’ supporting materials under a process used to decide whether a claim can be resolved without a trial.

Deadlines and Service

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by February 28, 2025. Mitmo, Inc.’s opposition, if any, is due March 28, 2025, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, is due April 18, 2025.

The petitioners must serve Mitmo, Inc. with the petition, all supporting papers, and the order in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than February 28, 2025. They must file an affidavit confirming service by March 3, 2025.

Disposition

Judge Margaret M. Garnett issued an order setting filing and service requirements. The order does not rule on whether the arbitration award will be confirmed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.