Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 7, 2025

Brown v. Master Barbers Barber Shop, Inc.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-01045
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Brown v. Master Barbers Barber Shop, Inc., Judge Rochon ordered settlement discussions and a joint status letter but did not decide the case’s merits.

Who this affects

The order affects plaintiff Altaune Brown and defendants Master Barbers Barber Shop, Inc. and 1169 2ND AVE LLC by requiring them to participate in settlement discussions and submit a joint letter to the court.

What happened

In Brown v. Master Barbers Barber Shop, Inc., the court ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served. They must make a good-faith effort to settle and discuss whether the plaintiff has satisfied the basic requirement of having standing to sue.

If the parties cannot settle, they must discuss whether mediation through the court’s program or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be useful. Within 45 days after service, they must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled and, if not, asking either for mediation or a magistrate-judge settlement conference, or for an initial status conference.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued this case-management order on February 7, 2025. The order did not decide standing, liability, or any other issue on the merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. Master Barbers Barber Shop, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-01045
Judge
Rochon
Date
Feb. 7, 2025

Order

The court ordered Altaune Brown, Master Barbers Barber Shop, Inc., and 1169 2ND AVE LLC to meet and confer within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The meeting must last at least one hour, and the parties must make a good-faith attempt to settle the action.

Standing Discussion

The parties were directed to consider whether Brown has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning a sufficient legal connection to bring the case. The order cited Second Circuit decisions concerning standing, but it did not decide whether Brown has standing.

Further Settlement Steps

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the district court’s court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time. Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or a magistrate-judge settlement conference, with a preference identified, or an initial status conference.

Disposition

This is a procedural case-management order. It does not resolve the parties’ claims, decide standing, or determine liability. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon entered the order on February 7, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.