Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 10, 2025

Rosario v. Los Castillos Mini Market, Corp.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-02240
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rosario v. Los Castillos, Judge Vyskocil adopted the damages recommendation and awarded Rosario $342,864.04 plus prejudgment interest.

Who this affects

Carlos Rosario, Los Castillos Mini Market, Corp., and Carlos Castillo; the order requires entry of judgment for Rosario’s damages and prejudgment interest.

What happened

In Rosario v. Los Castillos Mini Market, Corp., the court had previously granted in part and denied in part Carlos Rosario’s motion for a default judgment. The court then sent the case to a magistrate judge to determine damages.

Magistrate Judge Cott issued a Report and Recommendation concerning damages. No party objected, and the deadline for objections had passed. The district court reviewed the recommendation and found no error.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil adopted the recommendation in its entirety. The court ordered that Rosario was entitled to $342,864.04 in damages, plus prejudgment interest as described in the recommendation, and directed the clerk to enter judgment and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rosario v. Los Castillos Mini Market, Corp. · No. 1:23-cv-02240
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Feb. 10, 2025

Background

Carlos Rosario sued Los Castillos Mini Market, Corp. and Carlos Castillo. The opinion states that the court had previously granted in part and denied in part Rosario’s motion for a default judgment. The court then referred the case to a magistrate judge to determine the amount of damages.

Report and Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Cott issued a Report and Recommendation addressing damages. The parties had fourteen days to make specific written objections. No objections were filed, no extension was requested, and the objection deadline had passed.

When no timely objections are made, a district court may adopt the uncontested portions of a magistrate judge’s recommendation if the record shows no clear error. Although there were no objections here, the court stated that it independently reviewed the recommendation de novo, meaning anew and without relying only on the earlier review. The court found no error, clear or otherwise.

Ruling

The court adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. It ordered that Rosario was entitled to total damages of $342,864.04, plus prejudgment interest as set out in the recommendation. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment and close the case.

Because this order entered damages following a default judgment rather than resolving the underlying claims through an adversarial merits determination, it is classified as a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.