Ryan J. v. King
- Jeffrey Bryan
- 0:24-cv-01059
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Ryan J. v. King, Judge Bryan affirmed the denial of SSI benefits, denied Ryan J.’s request, granted King’s request, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.
Ryan J., whose application for supplemental security income was denied, and Michelle King in her capacity as Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
What happened
Ryan J. v. King concerned Ryan J.’s challenge to the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of his application for supplemental security income benefits.
A magistrate judge recommended denying Ryan J.’s appeal. Neither party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the recommendation, denied Ryan J.’s request for relief, granted Michelle King’s request for relief, affirmed the denial of benefits, and dismissed the matter without prejudice.
The detailed version
- Ryan J. v. King · No. 0:24-cv-01059
- Jeffrey M. Bryan
- Feb. 12, 2025
Background
Ryan J. challenged Acting Commissioner Michelle King’s denial of his application for supplemental security income. Ryan J. represented himself. Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the court deny Ryan J.’s appeal.
Review of the Recommendation
Neither party objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the deadline for objections had passed. Because there were no timely objections, Judge Bryan reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The court found no clear error.
Ruling
Judge Bryan adopted the Report and Recommendation. The court denied Ryan J.’s request for relief, granted the Commissioner’s request for relief, and affirmed the denial of benefits. The matter was dismissed without prejudice. The order directed that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.