Jones v. Little Greene Corporation
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-09068
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Jones v. Little Greene Corporation, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled action without costs, allowing restoration until March 17, 2025, otherwise with prejudice.
Clay Lee Jones and Little Greene Corporation; the case was discontinued without costs, subject to possible restoration by March 17, 2025, and otherwise dismissal with prejudice.
What happened
In Jones v. Little Greene Corporation, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil set March 17, 2025, as the deadline to request restoration; without such a request, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Jones v. Little Greene Corporation · No. 1:24-cv-09068
- Vyskocil
- Feb. 13, 2025
Background
The parties informed the court by letter that they had reached a settlement in principle.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The order stated that the action could be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by March 17, 2025. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Effect
The order ended the case based on the reported settlement process. It did not decide the underlying dispute between Clay Lee Jones and Little Greene Corporation.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.