Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2025

Jude v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:24-cv-08916
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jude v. New York State Department of Corrections, Judge Halpern ordered service on William Sherman but denied fee-free status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Steven Jude, William Sherman, the Clerk of Court, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the New York Attorney General’s Office.

What happened

Jude v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision is a lawsuit by Steven Jude, who is representing himself, claiming under a federal civil-rights law that defendants violated his constitutional rights at Sullivan Correctional Facility. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees and had already addressed service for several named defendants.

After the New York Attorney General’s Office provided William Sherman’s address, the court ordered the Clerk of Court to prepare the service paperwork for Sherman. The U.S. Marshals Service must receive the summons and other documents needed to serve him. The court also extended the service deadline to 90 days after summonses are issued.

Judge Philip M. Halpern directed the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service form, and send the documents to the Marshals Service. He also directed that the order and complaint be mailed to the New York Attorney General’s Office, and denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order because the appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jude v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision · No. 7:24-cv-08916
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Feb. 14, 2025

Background

Steven Jude brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims against state actors for violating constitutional rights. He alleged that defendants violated his constitutional rights at Sullivan Correctional Facility. Jude is representing himself and had been granted permission to proceed without prepaying court fees.

The court had previously issued an order concerning service on several named defendants. On February 3, 2025, the New York Attorney General’s Office identified an address for William Sherman.

Service Order

Because Jude was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court determined that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve process. The Clerk of Court was instructed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Sherman, issue a summons, and deliver the summons and other necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

The court stated that service must occur within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that period, Jude should request an extension of time. The court also required Jude to notify the court in writing if his address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service form with Sherman’s address, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail the order and complaint to the New York Attorney General’s Office. Judge Philip M. Halpern certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal.

This order addresses service and appeal-fee status; it does not decide whether Jude’s constitutional claims are valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.