Anderson Bey v. Roc Nation LLC
- Andrew Carter
- 1:24-cv-02295
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Anderson Bey v. Roc Nation, Judge Carter denied without prejudice the plaintiff’s motions for sanctions and partial summary judgment.
Plaintiff Bernard T. Anderson Bey and the defendants in this action; the court denied the plaintiff’s two motions without prejudice.
What happened
In Bernard T. Anderson Bey v. Roc Nation LLC, et al., the plaintiff asked the court to impose sanctions and to grant him partial summary judgment. He was representing himself without a lawyer.
The court said the plaintiff filed both motions without first submitting the required letter requesting a pre-motion conference. That violated the court’s Individual Rules of Practice.
The court denied both motions without prejudice and directed the clerk to terminate the related docket entries. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. issued the order.
The detailed version
- Anderson Bey v. Roc Nation LLC · No. 1:24-cv-02295
- Andrew Carter
- Feb. 20, 2025
Background
Bernard T. Anderson Bey filed this action and was proceeding without a lawyer. He filed a motion for partial summary judgment and a motion for sanctions. The opinion states that the court had previously addressed these motions and the plaintiff’s failure to seek a pre-motion conference during a December 3, 2024 status conference.
Reasoning
The court explained that self-represented litigants receive special consideration when their filings are reviewed, but they generally must still follow understandable procedural rules. The court found that Anderson Bey filed both motions without first filing the pre-motion conference letter required by the court’s Individual Rules of Practice.
Ruling
The court denied the plaintiff’s motion for sanctions and motion for partial summary judgment without prejudice. It directed the clerk to terminate ECF Nos. 56 and 69. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims or the merits of the requested summary judgment.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.