Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 21, 2025

McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-08442
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In McClellon v. Webull, Judge Swain ordered prisoner Donte McClellon to pay fees or submit authorization before the case proceeds.

Who this affects

Donte McClellon, the incarcerated self-represented plaintiff, must either pay the required fees or submit the prisoner authorization for the action against Webull Financial LLC to proceed.

What happened

McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC is a civil action brought by Donte McClellon, who is incarcerated and representing himself. The order does not describe the underlying claims.

McClellon asked to proceed without paying the fees upfront but did not submit the required prisoner authorization. The court gave him two choices: pay $405 or submit the authorization allowing deductions for the $350 filing fee from his prison account. The $55 administrative fee does not apply if the court grants permission to proceed without prepayment.

Within 30 days, McClellon must pay or submit the authorization. Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed that no summons issue yet and stated that the action will be dismissed if he does not comply. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McClellon v. Webull Financial LLC · No. 1:24-cv-08442
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 21, 2025

Background

Donte McClellon, who is incarcerated at Otisville Correctional Facility and is representing himself, filed this action against Webull Financial LLC. The opinion does not describe the claims underlying the action.

McClellon submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization. Under the statutes cited by the court, a prisoner seeking this status must authorize the facility holding him to deduct the filing fee from his account in installments and provide the court with certified account statements for the previous six months.

Court’s Order

The court ordered McClellon, within 30 days of the order, either to pay $405 in fees or to complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization. The $405 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee. The court explained that the $55 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment of fees, while the $350 filing fee remains payable in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

No summons will issue at this time. If McClellon complies, the Clerk’s Office will process the case under its procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

Additional Warning

The court cautioned that a future dismissal of a prisoner’s action as frivolous or for failure to state a claim can count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). After three such strikes, a prisoner generally cannot proceed without prepaying fees unless an exception for imminent danger of serious physical injury applies.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.