Ballentine v. Barak
- Analisa Torres
- 1:25-cv-00515
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
Ballentine v. Barak: Judge Torres ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants in Ballentine’s discrimination case.
Quintin J. Ballentine, the Postgraduate Center for Mental Health, and Jacob Barak; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to complete service.
What happened
In Ballentine v. Barak, Quintin J. Ballentine, who is representing himself, sued the Postgraduate Center for Mental Health and Jacob Barak. He sought damages and an order requiring action under several federal laws.
The court interpreted Ballentine’s filings as raising possible disability-based housing-discrimination claims under the Fair Housing Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and New York State and City human-rights laws. The opinion did not decide whether those claims are valid.
Because Ballentine had permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance, Judge Analisa Torres directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses and paperwork and directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve both defendants. Ballentine must ask for more time if service is not completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued and must notify the court of any address change.
The detailed version
- Ballentine v. Barak · No. 1:25-cv-00515
- Analisa Torres
- Feb. 26, 2025
Background
Quintin J. Ballentine, proceeding without a lawyer, sued the Postgraduate Center for Mental Health and Jacob Barak. The complaint sought damages and injunctive relief under provisions that Ballentine identified as Title 18, United States Code, Section 844(h); Title 42, United States Code, Section 3631; and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended.
The court interpreted the complaint and an attached report to the United States Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division as asserting possible disability-based housing-discrimination claims under the Fair Housing Act, possible disability-discrimination claims under the Rehabilitation Act, and disability-based housing-discrimination claims under the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws.
Order of service
The court had previously granted Ballentine permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Because he was proceeding under that permission, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the United States Marshals Service to serve the defendants.
Judge Analisa Torres directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for each defendant, complete a USM-285 process-receipt-and-return form with each defendant’s service address, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The court also directed service on the Postgraduate Center for Mental Health and Jacob Barak and directed the Clerk to mail Ballentine an information package.
The court stated that if the complaint was not served within 90 days after the summonses were issued, Ballentine should request an extension of time for service. He must notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.
Disposition
The opinion is an order directing service of the summons and complaint. It does not decide the merits of Ballentine’s discrimination claims or state that any defendant is liable.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.