Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 28, 2025

Citibank, N.A. v. Aralpa Holdings Limited Partnership

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-08842
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Citibank, N.A. v. Aralpa Holdings Limited Partnership, Judge Rochon lifted the stay after the appeals court affirmed.

Who this affects

Citibank, N.A.; Aralpa Holdings Limited Partnership; Rodrigo Lebois Mateos; and the assets of One57 36B, LLC and Aralpa Miami Investments LLC.

What happened

Citibank, N.A. v. Aralpa Holdings Limited Partnership involved a stay of part of the court’s judgment concerning assets of One57 36B, LLC and Aralpa Miami Investments LLC.

The stay covered a writ of execution and turnover order. After the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment and issued its mandate, the district court lifted the stay.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon ordered that the writ of execution and turnover order could proceed. This order did not address the underlying judgment’s merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Citibank, N.A. v. Aralpa Holdings Limited Partnership · No. 1:22-cv-08842
Judge
Rochon
Date
Feb. 28, 2025

Background

On February 16, 2024, the Court stayed the part of its judgment that granted Citibank’s motion for a writ of execution and a turnover order concerning the assets of One57 36B, LLC and Aralpa Miami Investments LLC. The stay was entered while an appeal was pending.

Appellate Proceedings

On January 24, 2025, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment by summary order. The appellate mandate issued on February 18, 2025.

Ruling

Because the appeal had been resolved and the mandate had issued, Judge Jennifer L. Rochon lifted the stay of the writ of execution and turnover order entered at Docket 110. This order addressed the stay and enforcement of the existing judgment; it did not decide the underlying merits anew.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.