Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2025

Borden v. Deloitte Consulting, LLC

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-01120
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Borden v. Deloitte Consulting, LLC, Judge Furman ordered Borden to identify Deloitte’s members’ citizenship or face dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Daniel Borden and Deloitte Consulting, LLC. Borden must provide the required citizenship allegations by March 10, 2025, or the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

What happened

Daniel Borden sued Deloitte Consulting, LLC, claiming the federal court could hear the case because of the parties’ different citizenship. He alleged that he is a Rhode Island citizen and described Deloitte as a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York.

The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of each of its members and any entities in its ownership chain. Because the complaint did not provide that information, the court ordered Borden to amend the complaint by March 10, 2025.

Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered that, if Borden cannot truthfully allege diversity of citizenship by the deadline, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice. The order did not address the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Borden v. Deloitte Consulting, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-01120
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Mar. 3, 2025

Background

Daniel Borden brought the action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. He invoked diversity jurisdiction, which allows a federal court to hear certain disputes involving parties with different state citizenship. Borden alleged that he is a citizen of Rhode Island. He described Deloitte Consulting, LLC as a for-profit Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York, New York, and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited.

Jurisdictional issue

The court explained that a limited liability company is treated as a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction therefore must identify the citizenship of each person or entity that makes up the LLC, including the citizenship of members that are themselves LLCs and the incorporation state and principal place of business of corporate members. The court found that the complaint did not provide this information for Deloitte.

Order

Judge Furman ordered Borden to amend the complaint by March 10, 2025, to allege the citizenship of each constituent person or entity comprising Deloitte. The court stated that if Borden cannot truthfully allege diversity of citizenship by that date, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice to either party. The order resolved a pleading requirement concerning the court’s authority to hear the case and did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.