Borden v. Deloitte Consulting, LLC
- Jesse Furman
- 1:25-cv-01120
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Borden v. Deloitte Consulting, LLC, Judge Furman ordered Borden to identify Deloitte’s members’ citizenship or face dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
Daniel Borden and Deloitte Consulting, LLC. Borden must provide the required citizenship allegations by March 10, 2025, or the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
What happened
Daniel Borden sued Deloitte Consulting, LLC, claiming the federal court could hear the case because of the parties’ different citizenship. He alleged that he is a Rhode Island citizen and described Deloitte as a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York.
The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of each of its members and any entities in its ownership chain. Because the complaint did not provide that information, the court ordered Borden to amend the complaint by March 10, 2025.
Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered that, if Borden cannot truthfully allege diversity of citizenship by the deadline, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice. The order did not address the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Borden v. Deloitte Consulting, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-01120
- Jesse Furman
- Mar. 3, 2025
Background
Daniel Borden brought the action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. He invoked diversity jurisdiction, which allows a federal court to hear certain disputes involving parties with different state citizenship. Borden alleged that he is a citizen of Rhode Island. He described Deloitte Consulting, LLC as a for-profit Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York, New York, and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited.
Jurisdictional issue
The court explained that a limited liability company is treated as a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction therefore must identify the citizenship of each person or entity that makes up the LLC, including the citizenship of members that are themselves LLCs and the incorporation state and principal place of business of corporate members. The court found that the complaint did not provide this information for Deloitte.
Order
Judge Furman ordered Borden to amend the complaint by March 10, 2025, to allege the citizenship of each constituent person or entity comprising Deloitte. The court stated that if Borden cannot truthfully allege diversity of citizenship by that date, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice to either party. The order resolved a pleading requirement concerning the court’s authority to hear the case and did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.