Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Jesse Furman
- 1:25-cv-01277
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Furman allowed an early ISP subpoena while protecting Doe’s anonymity and imposing safeguards.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may serve an expedited subpoena seeking John Doe’s identity, while Doe receives notice, may challenge the subpoena, and may remain anonymous. Doe’s internet service provider must follow the notice, preservation, disclosure, and cost procedures in the order.
What happened
In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, Strike 3 asked to subpoena Doe’s internet provider before the required early case conference so it could learn Doe’s identity. Strike 3’s lawsuit alleges that Doe illegally downloaded or distributed copyrighted material, but the court did not decide whether that allegation was true.
The court allowed the subpoena to seek Doe’s identity but prohibited Strike 3 from seeking Doe’s email address or telephone number through it. Doe may remain anonymous unless the court orders otherwise. The internet provider must notify Doe, and Doe has 60 days to challenge the subpoena. The provider cannot disclose identifying information before that period ends or while a timely challenge is pending.
Judge Jesse M. Furman also barred Strike 3 from starting settlement discussions before serving the complaint unless the court gives permission, required the provider to preserve subpoenaed information, and limited any disclosed information to protecting Strike 3’s rights in the lawsuit. Strike 3 must provide status letters every 60 days and may serve the complaint within 45 days after receiving information from the provider.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe · No. 1:25-cv-01277
- Jesse Furman
- Mar. 3, 2025
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued John Doe, identified in the caption as the subscriber assigned Internet Protocol address 70.18.2.178. The notice attached to the order states that Strike 3 alleges Doe illegally downloaded or distributed copyrighted material. Strike 3 did not yet know Doe’s actual name or address and asked for permission to serve a third-party subpoena on Doe’s internet service provider before the parties’ required conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).
Ruling on the subpoena
The court granted Strike 3’s motion for permission to serve the subpoena on an expedited basis to obtain Doe’s identity. The court relied substantially on the reasons stated in a prior related proceeding. The subpoena may not seek Doe’s email address or telephone number.
The court found substantial privacy concerns because of the nature of the copyrighted material involved and the possibility that the internet provider could identify the wrong person. Doe may therefore proceed anonymously unless the court later orders otherwise.
Procedures and safeguards
The internet provider has 60 days after being served with the subpoena to give Doe a copy of the subpoena, the order, and the attached notice. Doe then has 60 days after receiving the subpoena and order to file a motion challenging it, including a motion to quash or modify the subpoena. The provider may not disclose Doe’s identifying information before that deadline. If Doe or the provider files a timely motion, disclosure must wait until the court resolves the issues and directs the provider to proceed.
The provider must preserve subpoenaed information while a timely challenge is pending. It must confer with Strike 3 and may not charge costs before providing the requested information; if it charges production costs, it must provide Strike 3 with a billing summary and cost report. Any information disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights stated in the complaint.
Other orders and disposition
Strike 3 may not begin settlement discussions before serving the complaint without the court’s permission. If Doe starts settlement discussions, Strike 3 may participate and settle the case. Strike 3’s deadline to serve the summons and complaint is extended to 45 days after it receives information from the provider.
Strike 3 must send the court a status letter of no more than two pages every 60 days until Doe answers or otherwise responds to the complaint. The letter must describe Strike 3’s efforts to obtain the needed information and serve Doe. The court warned that failing to submit the letters on time may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute. The Clerk was directed to terminate the docket entry for the motion, ECF No. 7. This order addressed expedited discovery and related procedures; it did not decide the merits of Strike 3’s copyright allegations.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.