Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2025

Velasquez v. Antojitos Del Mangu 3rd Ave Restaurant Corp.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-01648
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Velasquez v. Antojitos Del Mangu 3rd Ave Restaurant Corp., Judge Rochon ordered settlement talks and a joint update without deciding the case’s merits.

Who this affects

Ricardo Velasquez, Antojitos Del Mangu 3rd Ave Restaurant Corp. doing business as Antojitos Del Mangu, and Jefferson/3531 LLC must comply with the settlement-discussion and joint-letter deadlines.

What happened

In Velasquez v. Antojitos Del Mangu 3rd Ave Restaurant Corp., the court ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served. They must make a good-faith effort to settle the case and discuss whether the plaintiff has met the basic requirement of having standing to sue.

If the parties cannot settle, they must also discuss whether court-connected mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be useful. Within 45 days after service, they must file a joint letter telling the court whether they settled. If they did not, the letter must ask either for mediation or a magistrate-judge settlement conference, while stating which option they prefer, or for an initial status conference.

Judge Rochon’s order only sets settlement and case-management requirements. It does not decide standing, liability, or any other merits issue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Velasquez v. Antojitos Del Mangu 3rd Ave Restaurant Corp. · No. 1:25-cv-01648
Judge
Rochon
Date
Mar. 3, 2025

Order

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. They must make a good-faith effort to settle the action. During those discussions, the parties should consider whether Ricardo Velasquez has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning a sufficient legal connection to bring the lawsuit. The order cites Second Circuit decisions concerning that issue but does not decide whether standing exists.

If the parties cannot settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the district court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time.

Within 15 additional days—making the deadline 45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, and state a preference between those options, or an initial status conference.

Disposition and Classification

The opinion is a case-management and settlement order. It does not rule on standing or the merits of Velasquez’s claims against Antojitos Del Mangu 3rd Ave Restaurant Corp. doing business as Antojitos Del Mangu, or Jefferson/3531 LLC. Because the court addressed only procedural and settlement matters, this is classified as a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.