Bien-Aime v. DOCCS
- Barbara Moses
- 1:24-cv-08797
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Bien-Aime v. DOCCS, Judge Moses ordered Elijah Blaise Bien-Aime to provide details to help identify Captain Kelly for service.
The order directly affects Elijah Blaise Bien-Aime, Captain Kelly, the City of New York, the New York City Department of Correction, and the Law Department. Bien-Aime must provide identifying information if he wishes to pursue his claims against Captain Kelly; the agencies must then try to identify her and address service.
What happened
In Bien-Aime v. DOCCS, the court was unable to identify a correction captain called Captain Kelly whom Elijah Blaise Bien-Aime seeks to sue. The New York City Department of Correction said it needed more information, and the City of New York had not waived service or appeared.
The court ordered Bien-Aime, if he wishes to continue his claims against Captain Kelly, to send information by March 17, 2025. The requested information includes her first name and badge number if known, when and where they interacted, how she interacted with him, and a physical description.
Judge Barbara Moses ordered the Law Department and the Department of Correction, within 30 days after receiving that information, to identify Captain Kelly if possible and provide an address for service or state whether the Department of Correction will accept service for her. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Bien-Aime v. DOCCS · No. 1:24-cv-08797
- Barbara Moses
- Mar. 3, 2025
Background
The opinion's caption identifies the plaintiff as Elijah Blaise Bien-Aime and names the City of New York and other defendants. On February 6, 2025, the court entered an order concerning service of the lawsuit and asked Captain Kelly, described as a female New York City Department of Correction captain assigned to the Rikers Island facility where the plaintiff was held on February 14, 2022, and the City of New York to accept service without formal summonses.
On February 11, 2025, the New York City Department of Correction declined to accept service for Captain Kelly because it needed more information to identify her. The City of New York had not accepted service or appeared in the action.
Order
Because the plaintiff is proceeding without a lawyer, the court stated that he is entitled to assistance in identifying a defendant. The court ordered that, if Bien-Aime wishes to pursue his claims against Captain Kelly, he must submit a letter by March 17, 2025, giving a more detailed description of her. The requested information includes her first name and badge number, if known; the exact date and approximate time of the interaction; the specific location; how she approached or interacted with him; and a physical description, including approximate height and weight, gender, and skin, eye, and hair color.
Within 30 days after Bien-Aime provides the information, the Law Department and the New York City Department of Correction must identify the defendant if possible and either provide the address or addresses where Captain Kelly can be served or state whether the Department of Correction will accept service on her behalf.
Disposition and significance
Judge Barbara Moses issued an identification-and-service order. The opinion did not decide whether Bien-Aime's underlying claims are valid, and it did not enter a judgment on those claims. This is a procedural order addressing identification of a defendant and service of process.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.