Magassouba v. The City of New York
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:23-cv-03686
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Magassouba v. The City of New York, Judge Karas entered judgment granting Defendants’ motions in full and dismissing Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice.
Plaintiff Moustapha Magassouba’s claims were dismissed with prejudice, and the defendants obtained full relief on their motions.
What happened
In Magassouba v. The City of New York, the judgment states that Defendants’ motions were granted in full. The judgment does not include the reasons from the Court’s separate Opinion and Order dated March 3, 2025.
The court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice because Plaintiff had already been allowed to file two complaints. The case was closed.
Judge Kenneth Karas is identified as the judge. The judgment was dated March 4, 2025, and entered by the Clerk of Court.
The detailed version
- Magassouba v. The City of New York · No. 7:23-cv-03686
- Kenneth Karas
- Mar. 4, 2025
Disposition
The judgment states that, for the reasons in the Court’s separate Opinion and Order dated March 3, 2025, Defendants’ motions were granted in full. It dismisses Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice, meaning the claims may not be brought again in this case.
Reason Given in the Judgment
The judgment explains that dismissal with prejudice was appropriate because Plaintiff had already had the opportunity to file two complaints. It cites decisions discussing when a plaintiff is not entitled to another opportunity to amend after earlier complaints did not correct identified problems.
Case Status
The judgment states that the case is closed. The provided text does not include the March 3 Opinion and Order or identify the specific legal grounds addressed in Defendants’ motions.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.