Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 5, 2025

Fletcher v. Facebook, Inc.

Judge
Vince Chhabria
Docket
3:25-cv-02276
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Fletcher v. Facebook, Judge Hendricks granted the plaintiff’s motion and transferred the action to the Northern District of California.

Who this affects

The transfer applies to Fletcher’s action against Facebook, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., and the other named categories of defendants.

What happened

In Fletcher v. Facebook, Inc., Timothy Randolph Fletcher filed an amended complaint alleging various civil-rights violations against Facebook, Meta, and other defendants. He represented himself.

A magistrate judge recommended granting Fletcher’s motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California. No party filed objections to that recommendation.

Judge Bruce H. Hendricks found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, granted Fletcher’s motion to transfer, and transferred the action to the Northern District of California. The order did not decide the allegations’ merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fletcher v. Facebook, Inc. · No. 3:25-cv-02276
Judge
Vince Chhabria
Date
Mar. 5, 2025

Background

Timothy Randolph Fletcher, representing himself, filed an amended complaint alleging various civil-rights violations against Facebook, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc., unidentified employees, unidentified government employees, unidentified organizations, and unidentified co-conspirators.

Recommendation and Review

The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for preliminary review. On February 13, 2025, the magistrate judge recommended granting Fletcher’s motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The parties were notified that they could object within fourteen days, but no objections were filed.

Because there were no specific objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error—an obvious mistake on the face of the record. The court reviewed the record, applicable law, and magistrate judge’s findings and analysis.

Ruling

Judge Bruce H. Hendricks found no clear error, adopted and incorporated the magistrate judge’s report, granted Fletcher’s motion to transfer, and transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order did not decide the merits of Fletcher’s civil-rights allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.