Algohaim v. United States
- Jesse Furman
- 1:25-cv-00760
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Algohaim v. United States, Judge Furman entered a protective order limiting use and disclosure of confidential benefits-record information.
The plaintiffs, the defendants, their attorneys and litigation-support personnel, and others who may receive protected information from the certified administrative record. The order also governs how that information may be filed with the Court and disclosed to governmental authorities.
What happened
In Algohaim v. United States, the parties jointly proposed a protective order for private information in the certified administrative record, including information about electronic benefits transfer card recipients and competitor stores.
The order allows the defendants to disclose that information to the plaintiffs’ lawyers for this case. The parties may not release it publicly or use it for anything other than the litigation. Plaintiffs may read the information only while their lawyer is present and may not keep, copy, or photograph it.
Judge Furman entered the protective order on March 6, 2025. The order also says protected information cannot be filed publicly in unredacted form, and that filing documents under seal requires a separate court order. It does not decide whether any particular information is confidential, discoverable, relevant, or admissible.
The detailed version
- Algohaim v. United States · No. 1:25-cv-00760
- Jesse Furman
- Mar. 6, 2025
Background
The parties submitted a jointly proposed stipulation and protective order. The order covers private information regarding electronic benefits transfer card recipients and competitor store information that is contained in the certified administrative record. The listed information includes names, addresses, Food and Nutrition Service numbers, electronic benefits transfer card numbers, household numbers, and other confidential, proprietary, personal, or similar information.
Terms of the Order
The order authorizes the defendants, including their contractors, agents, and employees, to disclose protected information in the certified administrative record to the plaintiffs’ counsel for purposes of litigating the action. The parties may not release the information to the public or to anyone not directly involved in the litigation, and they may use it only for this case.
The order limits further disclosure to the United States, its agencies and employees; the parties’ attorneys of record and their litigation-support personnel; the plaintiffs, subject to restrictions; and the Court and its employees. Plaintiffs may read the protected information only in the presence of their attorney and may not maintain, retain, keep, copy, or photograph it. Before disclosure, plaintiffs’ counsel must ensure that each recipient reads, understands, and agrees to follow the order. Further disclosure is prohibited.
At the end of the litigation, people who received protected information generally must return it to defense counsel and certify that the documents were returned and copies destroyed. The order remains in effect after the case ends. It does not require production of information protected by another privilege, statute, regulation, or authority.
Court’s Ruling
Judge Jesse Furman entered the protective order. The order states that it is not a decision about whether particular documents or information must be produced, or whether they are relevant or admissible. It also does not itself authorize filing documents under seal. A party must obtain another court order addressing specific documents or portions of documents before filing them under seal, subject to the stated procedures and the applicable federal rule on privacy redactions. If protected information is accidentally filed publicly, the parties must promptly seek permission to refile the document with the information properly redacted.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.