Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 7, 2025

Garcia Velez v. LSL Logistics LLC

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-01412
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Garcia Velez v. LSL Logistics, Judge Furman ordered defendants to identify LSL Logistics LLC’s members’ citizenship or face remand to state court.

Who this affects

The order directly affects LSL Logistics LLC and Cesar Omar Ortiz Ortiz, who must provide additional citizenship information to maintain the removal. It also affects Israel Garcia Velez and Lisa Vongnarath because the case may be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, County of Bronx.

What happened

Garcia Velez v. LSL Logistics LLC concerns defendants’ effort to move the case from state court to federal court based on the parties’ citizenship. The judge had already found problems in defendants’ first filing and found that their amended filing still did not properly describe LSL Logistics LLC’s citizenship.

The court explained that a limited liability company is treated as a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. Defendants therefore had to identify each member and provide the required information for any business entity that was a member. Saying only that the members were probably not citizens of certain states was not enough.

Judge Jesse M. Furman gave defendants one last chance to correct the filing by March 10, 2025. If they could not truthfully show complete diversity of citizenship, the case would be sent back to the Supreme Court of New York, County of Bronx, without further notice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia Velez v. LSL Logistics LLC · No. 1:25-cv-01412
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Mar. 7, 2025

Background

Defendants LSL Logistics LLC and Cesar Omar Ortiz Ortiz removed the action to federal court, invoking diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The court previously identified deficiencies in the notice of removal and ordered defendants to file an amended notice. Defendants filed that amended notice on March 6, 2025.

Jurisdictional Issue

The amended notice corrected one problem but still failed to properly allege the citizenship of LSL Logistics LLC. The court explained that an LLC has the citizenship of each of its members. A removal notice based on diversity jurisdiction must therefore identify the citizenship of each individual member and, for any corporate member, state its place of incorporation and principal place of business.

The court rejected defendants’ statement, made only “upon information and belief,” that the LLC’s members were not citizens of states where the removing party was a citizen. The court also stated that there was no basis for using that qualification because LSL Logistics LLC was itself the removing party.

Order

The court ordered defendants to amend the notice of removal by March 10, 2025, to allege the citizenship of every person or entity comprising LSL Logistics LLC, including the required corporate-member information. The court gave defendants one last chance to correct the jurisdictional allegations. If they could not truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship by that deadline, the action would be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, County of Bronx, without further notice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.