Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 7, 2025

Pettigrew v. Cavalry Portfolio Service LLC

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-01540
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Pettigrew v. Cavalry Portfolio Service LLC, Judge Furman ordered the Marshals Service to serve Pettigrew’s lawsuit.

Who this affects

Isaac Pettigrew and Cavalry Portfolio Service LLC; the Clerk of Court and United States Marshals Service were directed to take steps to serve the lawsuit.

What happened

Isaac Pettigrew, who is representing himself, sued Cavalry Portfolio Service LLC under federal debt-collection and credit-reporting laws and a New York law. The court had already allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

Judge Furman’s order directs the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, prepare the service form, and send the necessary papers to the United States Marshals Service. The Marshals Service will serve Cavalry. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

The court also directed Pettigrew to ask for more time if service is not completed within that period and to notify the court if his address changes. Judge Furman did not decide whether Pettigrew’s claims are legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pettigrew v. Cavalry Portfolio Service LLC · No. 1:25-cv-01540
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Mar. 7, 2025

Background

Isaac Pettigrew, proceeding without a lawyer, brought claims against Cavalry Portfolio Service LLC under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and New York General Business Law § 349. On March 5, 2025, the court granted Pettigrew permission to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

Order

Because Pettigrew was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the United States Marshals Service to serve Cavalry. The Clerk of Court was ordered to complete a USM-285 process-receipt-and-return form, issue a summons for Cavalry, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

The court stated that service must be completed within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Pettigrew should request an extension of time. The court also stated that Pettigrew must notify it in writing if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so. The Clerk was directed to mail Pettigrew an information package, and Pettigrew was told he could receive court documents by email by completing a consent form.

Disposition and Significance

This was an order arranging service of the lawsuit, not a decision on the merits of Pettigrew’s claims. Judge Jesse M. Furman directed the Clerk to issue the summons and related documents and send them to the Marshals Service for service on Cavalry Portfolio Service LLC.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.