Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 10, 2025

Richards v. Multinex Co. Ltd.

Judge
Carter
Docket
1:19-cv-06670
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureTort
In one sentence

In Richards v. Multinex, Judge Carter granted Thomas Richards default judgment on his claim that Multinex used his likeness on a T-shirt without permission.

Who this affects

Thomas Richards obtained a default judgment establishing Multinex Co. Ltd.’s liability on the Section 51 claim. Multinex remains subject to a damages proceeding, but the opinion does not determine the damages amount.

What happened

In Richards v. Multinex Co. Ltd., Thomas Richards alleged that Multinex used his likeness and image on a T-shirt without authorization, violating New York Civil Rights Law Section 51. Multinex was served but never appeared or defended the case.

The court accepted the complaint’s factual allegations as true and found that Richards established the legal requirements for his claim. It granted Richards’s motion for default judgment, meaning judgment was entered because Multinex did not respond.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. directed that the case be sent to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Ricardo to determine damages. The opinion did not set a damages amount.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Richards v. Multinex Co. Ltd. · No. 1:19-cv-06670
Judge
Carter
Date
Mar. 10, 2025

Background

Thomas Richards sued Multinex Co. Ltd., doing business as Nerdy, asserting several claims, including a claim under Section 51 of the New York Civil Rights Law. He alleged that Multinex used his likeness and image on a T-shirt without his authorization.

Multinex was served on October 6, 2019, but did not appear or otherwise defend the action. The Clerk issued a certificate of default. After an earlier motion for default judgment was denied in part concerning the timeliness of the Section 51 claims, the Second Circuit determined that Richards was a minor when the relevant events occurred. It ruled that the one-year limitations period began on his eighteenth birthday, October 5, 2018, and that his complaint, filed on July 17, 2019, was timely. Richards then renewed his motion for default judgment on the Section 51 claims.

Legal standard

A default judgment is a judgment entered against a party that fails to plead or otherwise defend. The court must accept the non-defaulting party’s well-pleaded factual allegations as true, but it must independently decide whether those allegations establish legal liability. Legal conclusions are not automatically admitted merely because the defendant failed to respond.

Decision

Section 51 prohibits using a person’s name, portrait, picture, or voice in New York for advertising or trade without written consent and provides a civil claim for violations. The court reviewed Richards’s allegations and the requirements of the claim and found that he had met his burden of proof. The court therefore granted Richards’s motion for default judgment.

Next step

The court directed the Clerk to terminate the motion and referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Ricardo for an inquest into damages. The opinion grants default judgment but does not determine the amount of damages.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.