U.S. Bank National Association v. Mattone
- Andrew Carter
- 1:23-cv-11035
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In U.S. Bank National Association v. Mattone, Judge Carter adopted the report and recommendation in full after no objections were filed.
The parties to the case—U.S. Bank National Association, Michael X. Mattone, and Carl F. Mattone—are affected by the court's adoption of the report and recommendation.
What happened
U.S. Bank National Association v. Mattone involved a report and recommendation issued in the case against Michael X. Mattone and Carl F. Mattone. The provided judgment does not explain the underlying dispute or what the report recommended.
The court stated that no objections or extension request had been filed. It therefore found that the plaintiff had waived the right to object to the report and recommendation or seek appellate review, reviewed the materials without objections, and adopted the report and recommendation in full.
Judge Andrew Carter is identified as the judge for this case. The provided judgment is dated March 10, 2025.
The detailed version
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Mattone · No. 1:23-cv-11035
- Andrew Carter
- Mar. 10, 2025
Action and disposition
The court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety. A report and recommendation is a magistrate judge's recommended disposition for review and adoption by the district court. The judgment states that, as of March 10, 2025, no objections had been filed and no request for more time to object had been made.
Effect of no objections
The court stated that the plaintiff had waived its right to object to the report and recommendation and to obtain appellate review. The court cited Frank v. Johnson and Caidor v. Onondaga County. Despite that waiver, the court reviewed the complaint, briefs, and report and recommendation and found the report well-reasoned and supported by the facts and law.
What the provided text does not establish
The judgment does not state the underlying claims, the relief sought, or the specific conclusions in the report and recommendation. Accordingly, the disposition can be stated as adoption of the report and recommendation, but the provided text does not establish the merits of the underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.