Heimlich v. Berkeley Educational Services of New York, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-08484
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Heimlich v. Berkeley, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after the parties reported a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by April 10, 2025.
Dana Heimlich and Berkeley Educational Services of New York, Inc., doing business as Berkeley College.
What happened
In Heimlich v. Berkeley Educational Services of New York, Inc., the court was informed by the mediator and the parties that they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied to restore it by April 10, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Heimlich v. Berkeley Educational Services of New York, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-08484
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 10, 2025
Background
The opinion states that Dana Heimlich sued Berkeley Educational Services of New York, Inc., doing business as Berkeley College. The mediator and the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by April 10, 2025. The court further stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on March 10, 2025.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.