Jackson v. RARY LLC
- Paul Magnuson
- 0:25-cv-00017
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Jackson v. RARY LLC, Judge Magnuson dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute and denied Jackson’s fee-waiver application as moot.
Nadia Jackson’s case was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, and her application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs was denied as moot. The defendants were affected by the dismissal.
What happened
Nadia Jackson sued RARY LLC and other defendants. The court considered a magistrate judge’s recommendation that the case be dismissed without prejudice because Jackson failed to prosecute it.
The district court reviewed the recommendation and found no error. It adopted the recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice.
Judge Magnuson also denied Jackson’s application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs as moot. The court ordered judgment to be entered.
The detailed version
- Jackson v. RARY LLC · No. 0:25-cv-00017
- Paul Magnuson
- Mar. 13, 2025
Background
Nadia Jackson brought this case against RARY LLC, doing business as Teamwrx, and several other defendants. The court considered a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster. The recommendation advised dismissing the matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Court’s analysis
The district court explained that it must independently review any part of a magistrate judge’s recommendation to which a party makes specific objections. If there are no specific objections, the court reviews the recommendation for clear error. After reviewing the recommendation, the court found no error, clear or otherwise, in the magistrate judge’s reasoning.
Ruling
Judge Paul A. Magnuson adopted the Report and Recommendation. The court dismissed the matter without prejudice and denied Jackson’s application to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs as moot. The court directed that judgment be entered.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.