Sekona v. Gutierrez
- Haywood Gilliam
- 4:23-cv-06311
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Etuate Sekona v. Gutierrez, Judge Gilliam denied the refund request as moot, ordered prison deductions to stop, and required $239.05 by April 2, 2025.
Etuate Sekona, the prison trust-account office, and the court’s financial office are affected. Sekona must pay the remaining $239.05 by April 2, 2025, to proceed, while the prison trust-account office must stop making deductions and forwarding payments.
What happened
Etuate Sekona v. Gutierrez concerns a prisoner’s request to recover filing-fee payments made in his civil-rights case. The court had previously allowed Sekona to proceed without paying the full fee upfront and directed deductions from his prison trust account.
After the court revoked that payment status, Sekona asked for a refund of the amount already collected so he could use it toward paying the full fee. The court explained that the payments had already been credited to the fee and that only $239.05 remained: $187.05 of the filing fee and a $52.00 administrative fee.
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. denied the refund request as moot, ordered the prison trust-account office to stop deducting and forwarding money, and required Sekona to pay $239.05 by April 2, 2025, to proceed. The court stated that it would dismiss the action without prejudice if the full amount was not received by that date.
The detailed version
- Sekona v. Gutierrez · No. 4:23-cv-06311
- Haywood Gilliam
- Mar. 17, 2025
Background
On or about December 4, 2023, Etuate Sekona filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Gutierrez, identified as an officer at Salinas Valley State Prison. The opinion states that Sekona was currently housed at Valley State Prison. On June 14, 2024, the court allowed Sekona to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without paying the entire filing fee at the start. The court directed the prison trust-account office to collect an initial $82.95 and then deduct 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the account whenever the balance exceeded $10.
On March 4, 2025, the court granted the defendants’ motion to revoke Sekona’s in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Sekona then requested a refund of the balance of the court fee already paid so he could apply that money toward paying the filing fee in full.
Ruling
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. denied the refund request as moot. The court explained that the amounts already paid had been credited toward the filing fee, so there was no need to return them. The court clarified that Sekona needed to pay the remaining $187.05 filing fee plus the $52.00 administrative fee, for a total of $239.05, by April 2, 2025, in order to proceed with the action.
The court also ordered the prison trust-account office to cease deducting and forwarding money from Sekona’s account. It stated that once in forma pauperis status is revoked, courts may no longer collect payments from a prisoner who is ineligible for that status under § 1915(g). The court directed the Clerk to send the order to Sekona, the correctional facility’s trust-account office, and the court’s financial office. The order terminated Docket No. 33. The court stated that if the full $239.05 was not received by April 2, 2025, it would dismiss the action without prejudice.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.