Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 13, 2025

nyamu v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:24-cv-06861
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nyamu v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Magistrate Judge Figueredo ordered Plaintiff to file her proposed amended complaint by March 21, 2025.

Who this affects

Plaintiff Nyamu must file the proposed amended complaint by March 21, 2025. The defendants are affected because the filing will be considered with Plaintiff’s request for permission to amend.

What happened

In Nyamu v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Plaintiff requested permission to file an amended complaint on January 14, 2025. Her request was still pending.

The court noted that a proposed amended complaint is typically filed with a request for permission to amend. Plaintiff represented that her proposed amended complaint was fully written.

Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo ordered Plaintiff to file the proposed amended complaint by March 21, 2025, so the court could consider it together with her pending request. The order did not rule on whether amendment would be permitted.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
nyamu v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-06861
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 13, 2025

Background

On January 14, 2025, Plaintiff requested leave, meaning permission, to file an amended complaint. The request remained pending before the court.

Court’s Action

The court explained that a proposed amended complaint is typically filed at the same time as a request for leave to amend. Plaintiff stated that her proposed amended complaint was “fully written.” The court therefore directed Plaintiff to file that proposed complaint on the docket by Friday, March 21, 2025, for consideration alongside her pending request.

Disposition

The order directed the filing of the proposed amended complaint but did not grant or deny Plaintiff’s request for leave to amend. Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.