Velasquez v. Mulberry Street Cleaners Inc
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-02241
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Velasquez v. Mulberry Street Cleaners, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled action, allowing restoration by April 18, 2025, or dismissal with prejudice.
The plaintiff and defendants in the action: Ricardo Velasquez, Mulberry Street Cleaners Inc. d/b/a New Mott Cleaners, and 278 Mott, LLC.
What happened
In Velasquez v. Mulberry Street Cleaners Inc., the court said the parties had reached an agreement to resolve all issues in the action.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied to restore it by April 18, 2025.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration application was filed by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Velasquez v. Mulberry Street Cleaners Inc · No. 1:24-cv-02241
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 19, 2025
Background
The court was notified that the parties had reached an agreement to resolve all issues in the action.
Ruling
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by April 18, 2025. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.