Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 19, 2025

Valles v. Attorney General of the United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-02215
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Valles v. Attorney General, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Andrew Valles's action against the Attorney General of the United States and the attorneys general of California, New York, and Utah was dismissed; fee-free status for an appeal was denied.

What happened

Andrew Valles sued the Attorney General of the United States and the attorneys general of California, New York, and Utah. The opinion does not explain the claims or the reasons for the lawsuit.

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its March 18, 2025, order, which is not included here. It also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on March 19, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Valles v. Attorney General of the United States · No. 1:25-cv-02215
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 19, 2025

Background

Andrew Valles brought this action against the Attorney General of the United States; the Attorney General of the State of California; the Attorney General of the State of New York; and the Attorney General of the State of Utah. The provided civil judgment does not describe Valles's claims or the March 18, 2025, order on which the dismissal was based.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in the March 18 order. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. As a result, the court denied Valles permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The judgment was signed by Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain.

Effect

The provided opinion establishes that the action was dismissed and that fee-free status was denied for an appeal. It does not state the underlying legal basis for dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.