Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 20, 2025

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:24-cv-05664
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. Doe, Judge Engelmayer granted Strike 3’s request to file identifying information under seal provisionally.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may provisionally file the specified documents under seal to protect the Doe defendant’s personally identifiable information. The order also affects public access to those documents while the case proceeds.

What happened

In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, Strike 3 asked to file unredacted versions of its amended complaint, proposed summons, and return of service under seal. The case concerns alleged downloading and distribution of Strike 3’s works through the BitTorrent network.

Strike 3 said the internet service provider identified the subscriber assigned to the relevant internet address and that its investigation identified the subscriber as the alleged infringer. Strike 3 sought to keep the defendant’s name, address, and other identifying information out of the public court file while the defendant’s privacy interests could be considered.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the request on a provisional basis. The court permitted the documents to be filed under seal to the extent they contain the defendant’s personally identifiable information, and reminded Strike 3 that approval is not required for five categories of sensitive information listed in the court’s individual rules.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe · No. 1:24-cv-05664
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Mar. 20, 2025

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC alleged that works it owns were downloaded and distributed through the BitTorrent network from internet address 96.246.31.231. On August 14, 2024, the court permitted Strike 3 to serve a subpoena on Verizon Online LLC to learn the identity of the subscriber assigned to that address.

According to Strike 3’s letter, after receiving the subpoena response and conducting additional investigation, it identified the subscriber as the alleged infringer and filed a first amended complaint. Strike 3 asked to replace the John Doe designation while continuing to use a pseudonym in the case caption. It also asked to file unredacted versions of the first amended complaint, proposed summons, and return of service under seal because those documents contain the defendant’s name, address, and other personally identifying information.

Issue and request

Strike 3 proposed that the documents be sealed provisionally. It argued that this approach would allow the defendant to become a party and be heard about privacy concerns before the identifying information was disclosed publicly. Strike 3 also proposed that it not file documents containing the defendant’s name or address on the public docket unless the court expressly authorized it.

Ruling

The court stated: “GRANTED.” It ruled that, to the extent the first amended complaint, proposed summons, and return of service contain the defendant’s personally identifiable information, those documents may be filed under seal on a provisional basis. The court also reminded Strike 3 that, under its Individual Rules, court approval is not required for the five categories of sensitive information identified in Individual Rule 4(B)(1).

This order addressed provisional sealing and public access to identifying information. The provided opinion does not decide whether the defendant infringed Strike 3’s works or resolve the underlying copyright claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.