Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 19, 2025

Moments v. Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09477
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil RightsCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Moments v. Doe, Judge Swain transferred the civil-rights case to Northern District of New York because the events and witnesses were there.

Who this affects

Betta Moments and C.O. Jane Doe; the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of New York, and the merits of Moments’s claims were not decided.

What happened

Betta Moments, who is incarcerated, sued a correctional officer identified as C.O. Jane Doe under a federal civil-rights law, alleging harassment and constitutional violations at Ulster Correctional Facility.

The court concluded that the Northern District of New York was an appropriate and more convenient venue because the alleged events occurred there, and the defendant, documents, and witnesses were expected to be there. The court did not decide whether Moments’s constitutional claims were valid.

The court transferred the case to the Northern District of New York and closed the case in the Southern District. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moments v. Doe · No. 1:24-cv-09477
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 19, 2025

Background

Betta Moments, who is currently incarcerated at Washington Correctional Facility, filed this self-represented action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She alleges that her constitutional rights were violated when she was incarcerated at Ulster Correctional Facility in Ulster County, New York. The defendant is identified as C.O. Jane Doe, a correctional officer whom Moments alleges harassed her.

Venue and Transfer

The court explained that federal law permits a civil action to proceed in a district where a substantial part of the events occurred. Moments did not provide Jane Doe’s residence because Doe is an unidentified defendant. The court therefore could not determine whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York based on the defendant’s residence. But the alleged events occurred at Ulster Correctional Facility, which is in the Northern District of New York, making venue proper there.

The court also considered transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which allows a court to move a case to another district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. It found that transfer was appropriate because the underlying events occurred at Ulster Correctional Facility, where Jane Doe was employed, and where the relevant documents and witnesses were reasonably expected to be located.

Disposition

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. It directed the Clerk of Court to carry out the transfer, stated that a summons would not issue from the Southern District, and closed the case there. The transferee court will decide whether Moments may proceed without prepaying fees. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order transferred the case without deciding the merits of Moments’s constitutional claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.