Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2025

Peden v. 230FA LLC

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:24-cv-07754
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Peden v. 230FA LLC, Judge Cave granted the parties’ request to extend the settlement-approval deadline by one week.

Who this affects

The parties were given until March 28, 2025, to submit their motion for settlement approval.

What happened

Peden v. 230FA LLC involved the parties’ joint request for more time to submit a motion asking the court to approve their settlement. They said they needed additional time to finish reviewing and signing the settlement agreement and related papers.

The parties asked to move the deadline from March 21 to March 28, 2025. They said it was their first request for an extension and that no other deadlines would be affected.

Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the request and extended the deadline through March 28, 2025. The court also directed the clerk to close the filing containing the request.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Peden v. 230FA LLC · No. 1:24-cv-07754
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Mar. 24, 2025

Request

The parties jointly requested a one-week extension of the deadline to file a motion seeking court approval of their settlement. The request concerned approval under the procedure associated with Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The parties explained that they had exchanged drafts and edits to the settlement agreement and approval motion, which were still under final review.

They asked to extend the deadline from March 21 to March 28, 2025. They stated that this was their first request for an extension and that no other deadlines would be affected.

Ruling

Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the parties’ request. The deadline for submitting the settlement-approval motion was extended through March 28, 2025. The clerk was directed to close ECF No. 32, the filing containing the request.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.