Knowles v. Bandlab US Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-09145
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Knowles v. Bandlab US Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after settlement in principle, subject to restoration by April 24, 2025.
Carlton Knowles, Bandlab US Inc., and the other persons identified in the caption as similarly situated.
What happened
In Knowles v. Bandlab US Inc., the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the proposed settlement’s terms.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied to restore the case by April 24, 2025.
If no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would become with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also postponed all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.
The detailed version
- Knowles v. Bandlab US Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-09145
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 24, 2025
Background
The parties reported that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state the claims asserted or provide the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was allowed if the parties were unable to memorialize the settlement in writing and filed an application to restore the action by April 24, 2025.
The court further ordered that, if no restoration application was made by April 24, 2025, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored through that procedure. All other dates and deadlines were adjourned indefinitely.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.