Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 25, 2025

Gregory F. v. Dudek

Judge
Laura Provinzino
Docket
0:23-cv-03787
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
4
Social SecurityFee Petition
In one sentence

In Gregory F. v. Dudek, Judge Provinzino granted Gregory F.’s motion for $6,512.75 in Equal Access to Justice Act attorneys’ fees.

Who this affects

Gregory F. receives the attorneys’ fee award as the litigant. The award may be offset to satisfy any pre-existing debts he owes to the United States.

What happened

In Gregory F. v. Dudek, the court had earlier sent Gregory F.’s disability-benefits case back to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. Gregory F. then asked for attorneys’ fees.

The Commissioner did not oppose an award. The court found that Gregory F. qualified for fees because the earlier remand made him the prevailing party. It also found that 27.25 hours of work and a rate of $239 per hour were reasonable.

Judge Laura M. Provinzino granted the motion and awarded $6,512.75 under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The award is payable to Gregory F. as the litigant and may be reduced to satisfy qualifying pre-existing debts to the United States.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gregory F. v. Dudek · No. 0:23-cv-03787
Judge
Laura M. Provinzino
Date
Mar. 25, 2025

Background

On January 27, 2025, the court granted in part Gregory F.’s motion for judgment on the administrative record and remanded the case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Gregory F. then moved for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA).

The motion requested $6,512.25. The Commissioner conceded that an award was appropriate.

Eligibility for Fees

The EAJA permits an award of attorneys’ fees to a prevailing plaintiff in an action seeking judicial review of a denial of disability benefits, unless the government’s position was substantially justified or special circumstances would make an award unjust. The court held that Gregory F. was a prevailing party because the sentence-four remand qualified him as such. Because the Commissioner did not argue that the government’s position was substantially justified, the court found Gregory F. entitled to EAJA fees.

Reasonableness of the Request

The court evaluated the requested fees using the lodestar method, which multiplies the reasonable hours worked by a reasonable hourly rate. Gregory F.’s attorneys reported 27.25 hours, which the court found reasonable.

The attorneys requested $239 per hour. Although the EAJA generally sets a $125 hourly cap, the court explained that a cost-of-living adjustment may justify a higher rate. Gregory F.’s attorneys calculated the adjusted rate using the 2024 average Consumer Price Index for urban consumers and the March 1996 index used when the statutory cap was enacted. Because the attorneys mostly worked on the case in 2024, the court found the $239 hourly rate reasonable.

Disposition

The court granted Gregory F.’s motion for attorneys’ fees. It awarded $6,512.75, representing 27.25 hours at $239 per hour, under the EAJA. The award is payable to Gregory F. as the litigant and is subject to offset for any pre-existing debts he may owe to the United States. The court directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.