Bizarre Academia, LLC v. Wolf
- Haywood Gilliam
- 4:24-cv-03058
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Bizarre Academia v. Wolf, Judge Gilliam granted Wolf’s motion to set aside default and deemed his answer properly filed.
The ruling removes the entry of default against Defendant Noah Wolf and allows his answer to remain filed; the case proceeds toward a case management conference.
What happened
Bizarre Academia, LLC sued Noah Wolf in June 2024 and served him in Germany through the Hague Convention. After Wolf missed the response deadline, the Clerk entered default against him on February 27, 2025.
Wolf asked the court to set aside the default, explaining that he had mailed his answer two days before default was entered and had notified the plaintiff’s lawyer. He also argued that he had a potentially valid defense and that setting aside default would not unfairly harm Bizarre Academia. The plaintiff said it wanted the case resolved on its merits.
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted Wolf’s motion because Wolf had tried to respond before default was entered and Bizarre Academia did not oppose the showing of good cause. The court deemed Wolf’s answer properly filed and scheduled a case management conference for April 15, 2025.
The detailed version
- Bizarre Academia, LLC v. Wolf · No. 4:24-cv-03058
- Haywood Gilliam
- Mar. 25, 2025
Background
Bizarre Academia, LLC filed its complaint against Noah Wolf in June 2024. In October 2024, the plaintiff completed international service of the complaint on Wolf at his address in Germany through the Hague Convention. Wolf did not respond by the deadline, so the plaintiff requested entry of default on February 21, 2025. The Clerk entered default on February 27, 2025.
The next day, the court received Wolf’s answer. Wolf had mailed the answer on February 25, 2025—two days before the Clerk entered default.
Motion to Set Aside Default
Wolf moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) to set aside the entry of default. He stated that he had taken steps to respond before default was entered, including mailing his answer and notifying the plaintiff’s counsel. He also argued that he had a meritorious defense, that setting aside default would not prejudice Bizarre Academia because the case was at an early stage, and that the plaintiff had not moved for default judgment.
Bizarre Academia filed a statement saying that it sought to resolve the case on its merits. The court treated the plaintiff as not opposing Wolf’s showing of good cause.
Ruling
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted Wolf’s motion to set aside default. The court relied on Wolf’s efforts to respond before default was entered and Bizarre Academia’s lack of opposition to his showing of good cause. The court ordered that Wolf’s answer be deemed properly filed and entered into the record.
The court also set a case management conference for April 15, 2025, at 2:00 p.m., and directed the parties to submit a joint case management statement by April 8, 2025, or separate statements if they could not file jointly.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.