In Re: Ricky Mott
- Analisa Torres
- 1:25-cv-01349
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Mott v. RGN-New York XXX, LLC: Judge Torres dismissed Mott’s appeal and denied his pending motions because a filing injunction applied and the reassignment order was not appealable.
Ricky Mott’s bankruptcy appeal and pending motions were dismissed or denied. RGN-New York XXX, LLC, acting through Regus Management Group, LLC, prevailed in obtaining that disposition.
What happened
In Ricky Mott v. RGN-New York XXX, LLC, Ricky Mott appealed a bankruptcy court order reassigning his bankruptcy case to Judge Sean H. Lane. Mott represented himself.
Regus Management Group, LLC, acting for RGN-New York XXX, LLC, argued that Mott’s appeal should be dismissed. Regus pointed to a prior filing injunction requiring Mott to obtain permission before filing any bankruptcy pleading anywhere in the country. Regus also argued that the reassignment order could not be appealed without permission from the court.
Judge Analisa Torres denied Mott’s pending motions and dismissed his appeal. She concluded that the filing injunction required dismissal and agreed that the reassignment order was not appealable because Mott had not received permission for an immediate appeal.
The detailed version
- In Re: Ricky Mott · No. 1:25-cv-01349
- Analisa Torres
- Mar. 25, 2025
Background
RGN-New York XXX, LLC, acting through Regus Management Group, LLC, was the petitioner in a New York state-court holdover proceeding against ABC Mining Co. After receiving an adverse ruling in that proceeding, Ricky Mott began a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Mott represented himself.
Regus moved to have the bankruptcy case reassigned to Judge Sean H. Lane. The Bankruptcy Court granted that motion on February 3, 2025. Mott appealed the reassignment order to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Arguments and analysis
Regus argued that Mott’s appeal and any motions connected to it should be dismissed for several reasons. One reason was a filing injunction that Judge Lane had entered in a prior bankruptcy case. The injunction required Mott to obtain permission from the Bankruptcy Court before filing any bankruptcy pleading anywhere in the country, whether for himself or someone else. The opinion states that Mott did not dispute the injunction’s existence and did not state that he had complied with it in his bankruptcy case. The court therefore concluded that the appeal had to be dismissed on that basis.
Regus also argued that the order reassigning Mott’s bankruptcy case was not appealable and that Mott had not received permission to file an immediate appeal. Mott did not respond to that argument. The court agreed with Regus, citing the statute governing appeals from bankruptcy courts.
Disposition
Judge Analisa Torres denied Mott’s pending motions, identified as ECF Nos. 2 and 7–8, and dismissed his appeal. The Clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions, close the case, and mail Mott a copy of the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.