Ke v. J R Sushi 2 Inc
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:19-cv-07332
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Ke v. J R Sushi 2 Inc, Judge Moses scheduled a conference and briefing about possible dismissal based on Yi Mei Ke’s conduct and additional sanctions against Troy Law.
Yi Mei Ke, the defendants, and Troy Law, PLLC, whose conduct and possible additional sanctions are addressed by the scheduled conference and briefing.
What happened
In Ke v. J R Sushi 2 Inc, the court scheduled a conference after Judge Engelmayer’s March 24, 2025 opinion and order. The conference will address whether Yi Mei Ke’s own conduct, rather than only the conduct of her lawyers at Troy Law, could support dismissal.
The court also requested briefing on whether additional sanctions should be imposed directly on Troy Law. Each side may file a brief of no more than eight pages. Yi Mei Ke’s brief must include an attorney declaration listing each contact between her and Troy Law during the period specified in the order, with details about the date, participants, communication method, and duration of real-time communications.
Judge Barbara Moses scheduled the conference for April 17, 2025, and set deadlines for the parties’ briefs. The order also explains when declarations by people who are not fluent in English must include certified translations and evidence that the translation was provided before signing.
The detailed version
- Ke v. J R Sushi 2 Inc · No. 1:19-cv-07332
- Paul Engelmayer
- Mar. 26, 2025
Background
The order responds to Judge Engelmayer’s March 24, 2025 opinion and order. It identifies two issues for further consideration: whether Yi Mei Ke herself engaged in “willfulness, bad faith, or reasonably serious fault” that could warrant dismissal, and whether additional sanctions should be imposed directly on Troy Law, PLLC, beyond sanctions previously imposed.
Scheduling and briefing requirements
Judge Moses scheduled a conference for April 17, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 20A of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The plaintiff and defendants may each submit a brief of no more than eight double-spaced pages. The plaintiff’s brief is due April 3, 2025, and the defendants’ brief is due April 10, 2025.
The plaintiff’s brief must be supported by an attorney declaration listing every contact between Troy Law and Yi Mei Ke from March 28, 2022, through May 20, 2024. For each contact, Troy Law must disclose the date and time, the participating Troy Law personnel, the method of communication, and, for real-time communications such as meetings, telephone calls, or video conferences, the duration.
Translation requirement and disposition
The parties may submit additional declarations with their briefs. If a declaration is written in English by a person who is not fluent in English, the relying party must provide a certified translation in the person’s native language and admissible evidence showing that the translation was provided before the person signed the English-language declaration. The order also permits the person to sign in their native language, provided that the relying party submits a certified English translation.
This order schedules a conference and supplemental briefing; it does not itself decide whether dismissal is warranted or whether additional sanctions should be imposed. Judge Barbara Moses issued the order on March 26, 2025.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.