Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 27, 2025

Mamot v. Geico Car Insurance

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-06717
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro SeMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Mamot v. Geico Car Insurance, Judge Swain barred future fee-free filings without permission and directed judgment dismissing the case.

Who this affects

Patricio R. Mamot, who is barred from filing future civil actions without paying fees in the Southern District of New York unless he first obtains the court's permission.

What happened

Mamot v. Geico Car Insurance involved a lawsuit filed without a lawyer by Patricio R. Mamot. The court had dismissed the lawsuit in 2021 for failing to state a claim and directed Mamot to explain why he should not be barred from filing future cases without paying fees and obtaining permission.

Mamot did not submit the required declaration. The court therefore barred him from filing future civil actions without paying fees in that court unless he first receives permission. He must attach his proposed complaint and a copy of the order to any permission request. The court also directed the clerk to enter judgment dismissing this case.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal. The order was issued on March 27, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mamot v. Geico Car Insurance · No. 1:21-cv-06717
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 27, 2025

Background

Patricio R. Mamot filed the action without a lawyer and had been allowed to proceed without paying the filing fee. On September 27, 2021, the court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The court also noted that Mamot had previously filed nine actions that were dismissed for lack of merit and ordered him to show cause—explain why—he should not be barred from filing further actions without paying fees in that court unless he first obtained permission.

Mamot filed a notice of interlocutory appeal on October 7, 2021, and moved for reconsideration on October 13, 2021. The court denied reconsideration on November 29, 2021, and the Second Circuit dismissed the appeal on December 27, 2021. Mamot did not file the declaration required by the September 27, 2021 order.

Rulings

The court issued the filing bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Mamot is barred from filing future civil actions without paying fees in the Southern District of New York unless he first obtains the court’s permission. Any motion seeking permission must be filed with the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit and must include both the proposed complaint and a copy of this order. If Mamot files an action without first seeking permission, the court will dismiss it for failure to comply with the order.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The clerk was directed to enter judgment dismissing this case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.