Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 28, 2025

Stevens v. SBMC

Judge
Edward Davila
Docket
5:25-cv-02298
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Dean Michael Stevens v. SBMC, Judge Riordan transferred the prisoner’s civil-rights case to the Northern District of California because venue was improper.

Who this affects

The transfer affects Dean Michael Stevens’s civil-rights case against SBMC and the other named defendants by moving it from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California.

What happened

Dean Michael Stevens, a state prisoner without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights lawsuit under federal law against SBMC and others in the Eastern District of California. He also applied to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court said the claim arose in Mendocino County, which is in the Northern District of California. Because the case was filed in the wrong federal district, the court determined that it could transfer the case to the proper district in the interest of justice.

Judge Sean C. Riordan ordered the case transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order did not decide the underlying civil-rights claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stevens v. SBMC · No. 5:25-cv-02298
Judge
Edward Davila
Date
Feb. 28, 2025

Background

Dean Michael Stevens, identified in the order as a state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against SBMC and others. He also filed an application to proceed without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Venue analysis

The court applied the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute identifies locations where a civil case may be filed, including the district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred. The court found that Stevens’s claim arose in Mendocino County, which is located in the Northern District of California.

Because the action had been filed in the Eastern District of California, the court determined that it was filed in the wrong district. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district when doing so serves the interests of justice.

Ruling

Judge Sean C. Riordan ordered that the matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order transferred the case based on venue and did not resolve the merits of Stevens’s civil-rights claims or state how the court would rule on his fee-waiver application.

Disposition

The matter was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.