Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. National…
Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. National Drywall Inc.
- Subramanian
- 1:25-cv-02348
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Drywall Tapers v. National Drywall, Judge Subramanian set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.
The petitioner, Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974, and the respondent, National Drywall, Inc., were affected by the filing, briefing, and service deadlines.
What happened
In Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. National Drywall, Inc., the petitioner asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was filed on March 21, 2025.
The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve any additional supporting materials by April 17, 2025. Any opposition from National Drywall was due May 8, and any reply was due May 15. The petitioner also had to serve the petition, supporting papers, and order under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by March 31 and file proof of service by April 1.
The order set procedures and deadlines but did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award. Judge Arun Subramanian signed the order on March 27, 2025.
The detailed version
- Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. National… · No. 1:25-cv-02348
- Subramanian
- Mar. 27, 2025
Background
On March 21, 2025, the petitioner filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award. Confirming an arbitration award means asking the court to recognize the award through a court order. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment, a procedure generally decided from the parties’ written submissions rather than a trial.
What the Court Ordered
The court ordered the petitioner to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by April 17, 2025. National Drywall’s opposition, if any, was due May 8, 2025, and the petitioner’s reply, if any, was due May 15, 2025.
The petitioner also had to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on National Drywall under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by March 31, 2025. The petitioner had to file an affidavit confirming service by April 1, 2025.
Result and Classification
The court did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award. It issued a scheduling and service order setting deadlines for further submissions. Judge Arun Subramanian entered the order on March 27, 2025. This is classified as a procedural order because it addressed case-management requirements rather than the merits of the petition.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.