Nuvyyo USA, LLC v. ProductWind, Inc.

Document and request

The provided text is a filing by Plaintiff Nuvyyo USA, LLC, not a court order. Nuvyyo asks for permission to file Exhibits A and B to its complaint under seal.

Background

Nuvyyo states that the action arises from a contract for internet-based marketing services. It identifies Exhibit A as an Influencer Marketing Services Agreement and Exhibit B as Statement of Work No. 1. Nuvyyo says the complaint has seven exhibits, labeled A through G, and that it filed the complaint against Defendant ProductWind, Inc. at the same time as the sealing request.

Arguments for sealing

Nuvyyo cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d), which allows a court to order a filing under seal without redaction, and Rule 26(c), which permits protection of confidential commercial information upon a showing of good cause. Nuvyyo acknowledges that the exhibits are judicial documents subject to a presumption of public access, but argues that the documents contain information not generally available to the public and that the agreement itself requires confidentiality. It asserts that the parties have a legitimate privacy interest in preventing disclosure of this business information.

Disposition

The provided text contains no ruling granting, denying, or otherwise disposing of Nuvyyo’s request. Judge Louis Stanton is identified in the supplied case information, but no order by Judge Stanton appears in the text provided.