Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2025

Goldenberg v. NeoGenomics, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-10314
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSecurities
In one sentence

In Goldenberg v. NeoGenomics, Judge Rearden granted Daniel Goldenberg’s motion to appoint DiCello Levitt LLP as co-lead counsel.

Who this affects

Lead Plaintiff Daniel Goldenberg, Gibbs Law Group, DiCello Levitt LLP, and the defendants’ litigation teams.

What happened

In Goldenberg v. NeoGenomics, Lead Plaintiff Daniel Goldenberg asked the court to appoint DiCello Levitt LLP as additional co-lead counsel alongside Gibbs Law Group.

Goldenberg said DiCello Levitt had become fully involved in the case and had contributed work, resources, and experience to investigating the claims, researching issues, and drafting an amended complaint. The firm’s qualifications showed substantial securities-litigation experience, and it agreed to take reasonable steps to avoid duplicating work.

The court granted the motion. Judge Jennifer H. Rearden noted that neither the plaintiffs’ current counsel nor the defendants’ counsel opposed the appointment and directed the clerk to close the motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Goldenberg v. NeoGenomics, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-10314
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Mar. 31, 2025

Background

Lead Plaintiff Daniel Goldenberg moved to appoint DiCello Levitt LLP as co-lead counsel. He selected DiCello Levitt as co-counsel with the full support of current Lead Counsel, Gibbs Law Group.

The motion stated that DiCello Levitt had become fully integrated into the litigation team and had contributed labor, resources, and expertise to investigating the case, researching legal issues, and drafting the amended complaint. The firm’s resume showed extensive experience in securities litigation and indicated that it was qualified, experienced, and generally able to conduct the litigation. The firm also assured the court that it would take reasonable steps to avoid duplicating efforts.

Ruling

The court stated that neither current counsel for the plaintiffs nor counsel for the defendants opposed appointing DiCello Levitt as co-lead counsel. Judge Jennifer H. Rearden therefore granted Lead Plaintiff’s motion. The clerk was directed to terminate the motion listed as ECF No. 57.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.