Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2025

All Year Holdings Limited v. Silberstein

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:24-cv-00800
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
BankruptcyArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In All Year Holdings v. Silberstein, Judge Rearden denied as moot a stay request after the bankruptcy court denied partial summary judgment.

Who this affects

Defendant Yoel Silberstein’s request to pause the bankruptcy adversary proceeding was denied as moot; his separate motion to withdraw the reference and compel arbitration remained pending.

What happened

All Year Holdings Limited v. Silberstein concerns a bankruptcy-related adversary proceeding. Defendant Yoel Silberstein had asked the district court to pause that proceeding while it considered his requests to move the matter out of bankruptcy court and require arbitration. The bankruptcy court later denied the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment in its entirety.

Because the bankruptcy court’s decision removed the need for a stay, the district court denied Silberstein’s stay application as moot. The separate motion to move the proceeding out of bankruptcy court and compel arbitration remained undecided. The court also scheduled a status conference for April 7, 2025.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden ordered the Clerk of Court to terminate the stay motion, identified as ECF No. 12. This order did not decide whether the dispute must be arbitrated or whether the bankruptcy court’s reference should be withdrawn.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
All Year Holdings Limited v. Silberstein · No. 1:24-cv-00800
Judge
Rearden
Date
Mar. 31, 2025

Background

The defendant sought a stay of an adversary proceeding pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. He also had a separate motion pending in the district court seeking to withdraw the bankruptcy court’s reference of the adversary proceeding and to compel arbitration under a November 2015 agreement.

The defendant filed the stay motion under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 5011(c), arguing that the bankruptcy proceeding should pause while the district court decided the motion to withdraw the reference and compel arbitration. While the stay motion was pending, discovery was completed, and the plaintiff amended its complaint to add claims based on the same operative facts. The bankruptcy court then allowed the plaintiff to seek partial summary judgment on certain claims.

On February 19, 2025, the bankruptcy court denied the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment in its entirety. The defendant then reported that this decision had made the stay request moot, although the separate motion to withdraw the reference and compel arbitration remained pending.

Ruling

The district court denied the defendant’s application to stay the adversary proceeding as moot. The court directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF No. 12. It also scheduled a status conference for April 7, 2025, at 11:45 a.m.

The order did not rule on the defendant’s motion to withdraw the bankruptcy court’s reference or compel arbitration. It likewise did not decide the merits of the underlying claims. The order noted that those issues remained pending and that the arbitration question should be addressed before the parties and court spent substantial resources preparing for a possible jury trial.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.