Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2025

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Dame Contracting, Inc.

Judge
Victor Marrero
Docket
1:25-cv-02557
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters v. Dame Contracting: Judge Torres set deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners, Dame Contracting, Inc., and the New York Secretary of State were affected by the filing, briefing, and service requirements. The order did not determine whether the arbitration award would be confirmed.

What happened

The Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters and related funds and organizations filed a petition against Dame Contracting, Inc. to confirm an arbitration award.

Judge Torres ordered the petitioners to file supporting materials and a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1, and set deadlines for Dame Contracting's opposition and the petitioners' reply. She also required the petitioners to personally serve the petition and order on Dame Contracting and serve the New York Secretary of State, then file proof of service.

The order set procedures and deadlines but did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award. Judge Analisa Torres issued the order on March 31, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:25-cv-02557
Judge
Victor Marrero
Date
Mar. 31, 2025

Background

On March 27, 2025, the petitioners filed a petition seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are handled similarly to a motion for summary judgment, which is a procedure for deciding a case when the relevant facts are not genuinely disputed.

Court-Ordered Deadlines

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1 and any additional supporting materials by April 21, 2025. Those materials were to include legal memoranda, the arbitration award, supporting documents, and affidavits or declarations stating that the exhibits were true and correct copies.

Dame Contracting was given until May 5, 2025, to file an opposition, if any. The petitioners were given until May 12, 2025, to file a reply, if any.

Service Requirements and Disposition

The petitioners were required to serve Dame Contracting with the petition and order by April 7, 2025, using personal service on an officer, director, managing or general agent, cashier or assistant cashier, or another agent authorized to receive service under New York law. They also had to serve the New York Secretary of State and file an affidavit confirming service by April 9, 2025.

The order established briefing and service procedures. It did not grant or deny the petition to confirm the arbitration award, and it did not decide the merits of that petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.