Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2025

GS Holistic, LLC v. Alseeiadi

Judge
Charles Breyer
Docket
3:23-cv-00749
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
15
Intellectual PropertyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In GS Holistic v. Dukaan Alhanjari, Judge Breyer granted default judgment against two individuals but denied it against the company for untimely service.

Who this affects

GS Holistic, LLC received a $5,000 default judgment, $1,397 in costs, and post-judgment interest against Salah Khulaqi and Mohsin Alriashi. Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. d/b/a Berkeley Tobacco was not subject to default judgment because service was untimely, and GS’s requests for an injunction and destruction of products were denied.

What happened

GS Holistic, LLC sued Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. d/b/a Berkeley Tobacco, Salah Khulaqi, and Mohsin Alriashi, claiming they sold a counterfeit product bearing GS’s Stündenglass trademarks. None of the defendants appeared. GS asked for default judgment, damages, costs, interest, an injunction, and destruction of infringing products.

The court found that GS properly served Khulaqi and Alriashi but served Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. 196 days after filing its second amended complaint, beyond the 90-day deadline. The court also found that GS adequately alleged trademark counterfeiting, infringement, and related claims. It reduced the requested statutory damages from $150,000 to $5,000 because the evidence showed only one sale and did not establish large-scale counterfeiting. It awarded $1,397 in costs and post-judgment interest, but denied the requested injunction and destruction order.

In GS Holistic, LLC v. Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. d/b/a Berkeley Tobacco, et al., Judge Charles R. Breyer granted the default-judgment motion as to Salah Khulaqi and Mohsin Alriashi, awarding $5,000 in damages, $1,397 in costs, and post-judgment interest. He denied without prejudice the motion as to Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. and the requests for injunctive and other equitable relief.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
GS Holistic, LLC v. Alseeiadi · No. 3:23-cv-00749
Judge
Charles Breyer
Date
Apr. 2, 2025

Background

GS Holistic, LLC alleged that Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. d/b/a Berkeley Tobacco, Salah Khulaqi, and Mohsin Alriashi infringed, counterfeited, and falsely designated the origin of GS’s registered Stündenglass trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act. GS alleged that an investigator bought a glass infuser bearing a Stündenglass mark from the defendants’ Berkeley store for $350.50 and that a GS agent determined the product was counterfeit. The Clerk entered default after the defendants failed to appear.

Service and jurisdiction

The court found that GS served Khulaqi and Alriashi within the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure’s 90-day service period. GS served Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. 196 days after filing the second amended complaint and did not show good cause for the delay. The court therefore denied the default-judgment motion without prejudice as to that company. The court concluded that it had federal subject-matter jurisdiction over the trademark claims and personal jurisdiction over the relevant defendants.

Claims and default judgment

For Khulaqi and Alriashi, the court applied the factors used to decide whether default judgment is appropriate. It concluded that the allegations established GS’s ownership of protectable marks, unauthorized use of confusingly similar marks, and a likelihood that consumers would be confused. The defendants’ failure to appear also meant that there was little prospect of a dispute over the liability-related allegations. The court therefore granted the motion for default judgment as to Khulaqi and Alriashi.

Relief

GS requested $150,000 in statutory damages, or $50,000 for each of three registered marks. The court awarded $5,000 in total statutory damages instead. It reasoned that the record described one sale involving one counterfeit product and did not show that the defendants produced or distributed counterfeit products on a significant scale. The court found that $5,000 was above the statutory minimum, more than ten times the price of the sale, and sufficient to deter future infringement without giving GS an unwarranted financial gain.

The court awarded $1,397 in costs for the filing fee and service fees, but did not award the $415.50 in pre-suit investigation expenses because GS cited no authority supporting that request. The court granted GS’s request for post-judgment interest.

GS requested a permanent injunction directed at Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. and related persons, but the court denied that request because the company had not been timely served. The court also denied GS’s request to have infringing products delivered for destruction because GS provided no supporting argument or evidence.

Disposition

The court granted the motion for default judgment as to Salah Khulaqi and Mohsin Alriashi, awarding $5,000 in total statutory damages, $1,397 in costs, and post-judgment interest. It denied without prejudice the motion as to Dukaan Alhanjari Inc. d/b/a Berkeley Tobacco and denied the requests for injunctive and other equitable relief.

The authoritative version

Read the full 15-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.