Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2025

Hanover Insurance Group v. Panther Express Line, Corp.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:24-cv-03490
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hanover Insurance Group v. Panther Express Line, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by May 2, 2025.

Who this affects

Hanover Insurance Group and Panther Express Line, Corp.; the action was closed subject to possible restoration by May 2, 2025, after which the dismissal would be with prejudice if no restoration application was made.

What happened

Hanover Insurance Group sued Panther Express Line, Corp., and told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs and allowed either party to seek restoration if the settlement could not be put in writing, provided the request was made by May 2, 2025. If no request was made by then, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions listed at Docket Numbers 12 and 20 and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hanover Insurance Group v. Panther Express Line, Corp. · No. 1:24-cv-03490
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 2, 2025

Background

Hanover Insurance Group, as subrogor of Joe Monani Fish Co., Inc., brought the action against Panther Express Line, Corp. The court received a letter from Hanover stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court's calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by May 2, 2025. The court further stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions at Docket Numbers 12 and 20 and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.