Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2025

In Re: Carzell Benton

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:24-cv-07945
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In re Carzell Benton: Judge Failla gave the appellant until May 1, 2025, to file a bankruptcy-appeal brief or face dismissal.

Who this affects

The appellant in Carzell Benton’s bankruptcy appeal must file the required brief by May 1, 2025, or risk dismissal under the court’s scheduling order.

What happened

In re Carzell Benton concerns a bankruptcy appeal in which the appellant was required to file a brief after notice that the appeal record was available. That notice was filed on November 25, 2024, but the appellant had not filed a brief by the time of this order.

The court gave the appellant one final opportunity to serve and file the brief by May 1, 2025. The court stated that it would grant no further extensions and directed the clerk to mail the order to the appellant.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla did not dismiss the appeal in this order. She warned that failing to meet the deadline could result in dismissal under the court’s earlier scheduling order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: Carzell Benton · No. 1:24-cv-07945
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Apr. 2, 2025

Background

The matter is a bankruptcy appeal assigned to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On October 23, 2024, Judge Katherine Polk Failla entered a Bankruptcy Appeal Scheduling Order. That order required the appellant to serve and file an appeal brief within 30 days after the docketing of notice that the appeal record had been transmitted or was available electronically.

The notice that the record was available was filed on November 25, 2024. The appellant had not filed an appeal brief by the time of the present order. The earlier scheduling order stated that failing to comply with the court’s deadlines would result in dismissal of the appeal.

Court’s Action

The court gave the appellant one final opportunity to submit a brief. It ordered the appellant to serve and file the brief on or before May 1, 2025, and stated that no further extensions would be granted for any reason.

The court directed the clerk to mail a copy of the order to the appellant at the address listed in the order. The court did not dismiss the appeal in this order.

Legal Significance

This is a procedural order enforcing the briefing schedule in a bankruptcy appeal. It does not decide the underlying bankruptcy issues or the merits of the appeal. The earlier scheduling order states that failure to comply with the deadline may result in dismissal of the appeal, but this order itself grants additional time rather than entering that dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.