Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 4, 2025

Perez v. Westchester Community Opportunity Program

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:25-cv-01772
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
ADA / DisabilityEmploymentCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Perez v. Westchester Community Opportunity Program, Judge Halpern ordered Marshals service for Perez’s disability-discrimination lawsuit.

Who this affects

Erica Sophia Perez and Westchester Community Opportunity Program; the order also directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to carry out service.

What happened

Erica Sophia Perez, representing herself, sued Westchester Community Opportunity Program under the Americans with Disabilities Act and New York State Human Rights Law, alleging disability discrimination by her employer.

Because the court had allowed Perez to proceed without paying filing fees in advance, she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The order also extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Halpern directed the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, complete the service forms, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Perez’s discrimination claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. Westchester Community Opportunity Program · No. 7:25-cv-01772
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Apr. 4, 2025

Background

Erica Sophia Perez, proceeding without a lawyer, brought claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the New York State Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer, Westchester Community Opportunity Program, discriminated against her because of her disability. The court had previously granted Perez permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of the Lawsuit

Because Perez was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, federal law permits her to rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court explained that Perez could not have served the defendant before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. It therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Westchester Community Opportunity Program, complete the U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with the defendant’s address, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Perez an information package. If service is not completed within 90 days after the summons is issued, Perez should ask for more time. Perez must notify the court in writing if her address changes, and the court stated that it may dismiss the action if she fails to do so.

Judge Philip M. Halpern’s order addressed service of process only. It did not decide the merits of Perez’s disability-discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.