Taramore Square, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:24-cv-03131
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Taramore Square v. Mt. Hawley, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs and without prejudice to timely restoration.
Taramore Square, LLC and Mt. Hawley Insurance Company; the action was closed subject to the stated 30-day procedure for restoration or court retention of authority to enforce a settlement.
What happened
Taramore Square, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company was reported to the court as settled in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 30 days. The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also said that any request for the court to enforce the settlement had to place the agreement on the public record and receive the court’s approval within 30 days. The court did not decide the underlying dispute.
The detailed version
- Taramore Square, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company · No. 1:24-cv-03131
- Ronnie Abrams
- Apr. 8, 2025
Background
The court stated that it had been informed that the case was settled in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.
Court’s action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It stated that an application filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
The court added that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction—meaning authority to enforce the settlement agreement—the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.
Result
The court discontinued the action and closed the case. It did not rule on the underlying dispute or state that the settlement had been finalized.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.